禁闭岛

习近平作出重要指示强调 巩固拓展树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育成果 努力创造经得起实践人民历史检验的实绩_我的网站

一 |     

    Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle Photo: Courtesy of China's Supreme People's Court Guangzhou Maritime Court recently successfully mediated a 180 million yuan ($25 million) dispute arising from a collision between two oil tankers in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, with both parties agreeing to apply Chinese law and submit their dispute to the Chinese court, the Global Times learned from the court on Sunday.
In 2025, two crude oil tankers collided at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, 24 nautical miles off Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, media reported.
Owned by oil tanker operator Frontline, the Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle collided with the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged vessel Adalynn on the morning of June 17, 2025.
The Adalynn was damaged in the fire. While the Front Eagle was undergoing repairs in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province, Global Shipping Holding Ltd., which owns the Adalynn, applied to Guangzhou Maritime Court for its arrest. Frontline provided a cash security of 203 million yuan to release the arrest and applied to establish a limitation fund for maritime claims.
The court approved the application and allowed Frontline to establish the limitation fund, setting the amount of the fund at 168 million yuan.
Guangzhou Maritime Court held four pretrial conferences on October 11, 2025, January 12, May 6 and July 13, 2026 to complete preparations for evidence examination, technical investigations and reported the relevant pretrial arrangements to the provincial high court, the Global Times learned from the court. 
The court held a public hearing for the case on July 14, 2026.
No government agency had conducted an investigation into the collision, and no official findings were issued after the accident. Taking into account the unique burden-of-proof challenges in maritime collision disputes, Guangzhou Maritime Court took measures to preserve key evidence when handling the vessel arrest, including navigation logs, AIS data, voyage data recorder (VDR) records and CCTV footage, the court told the Global Times in a statement on Sunday.
Under a process that involves exchanging evidence inventories, sealing materials simultaneously and jointly reviewing them after evidence submissions, the court helped ensure the authenticity of critical records and laid the groundwork for determining the facts of the case.
As the two sides and their respective maritime experts reached sharply different conclusions over liability, the court introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism, with the consent of both parties, allowing technical experts to participate throughout the proceedings. Drawing on the preserved evidence, investigators reconstructed the collision, assessed the vessels' encounter situation and clarified the parties' respective responsibilities.
Following the hearing, the court facilitated mediation, and the two parties reached a settlement agreement on July 27, 2026. On July 31, the court organized the distribution of the maritime liability limitation fund among creditors involved in the foreign vessel collision dispute and related charter-party disputes. 
Representatives of the Adalynn traveled from overseas to the court to present a letter of appreciation and a commemorative banner in recognition of the court's efforts, according to the court statement. 
After the Guangzhou Maritime Court accepted the case, both parties agreed to apply Chinese law to establish a maritime liability limitation fund and resolve their substantive dispute, breaking away from the long-standing reliance of international shipping disputes on European and US courts and legal systems.
Choice of justice 
Bilov Viacheslav, a representative of Global Shipping Holding Ltd., told the Global Times that the main reason they chose a Chinese court to mediate the case is that "we want absolutely fair, unbiased approach to this issue. Because nowadays in this world, there are some countries which believe that they are authorized to give instruction to all others, which definitely is having influence on the decisions of the judge on the approach to the case."
Viacheslav gave the Chinese court's handling of the case a five-star rating, saying he had expected the dispute to take at least three years to resolve, but the Chinese court settled it within just one year. He also praised the judges and lawyers for their commitment to advancing the case throughout the proceedings.
"The judges and lawyers worked to advance the case with the same level of commitment as I did, even though the case directly concerned my own interests. This left a deep impression on me about litigation in China," Viacheslav said.
The case involved two foreign parties and a collision that occurred near the Strait of Hormuz, with no direct connection to China or Guangzhou Maritime Court initially. The fact that the parties chose to seek vessel arrest in China and agreed to apply Chinese law demonstrates the credibility and appeal of China's maritime judicial system, Wu Guining, vice president of the Guangzhou Maritime Court, who served as the presiding judge of the case, told the Global Times. 
The court also introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism in the case, an innovation aimed at addressing complex technical issues arising from vessel collision accidents, Wu said, noting that through technical investigations, the court was able to establish the facts of the case more efficiently, highlighting the integration of professional maritime investigation capabilities with China's specialized maritime adjudication system.
The case demonstrates China's ability to handle major, complex and cross-border maritime disputes with professional expertise, Wu said.
The handling of the collision between the two vessels is just one example of how Chinese courts have been dealing with a growing number of foreign-related maritime cases in recent years.
The Global Times learned from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) in October last year that over the past 40 years, Chinese courts have handled a total of 88,000 foreign-related maritime cases involving parties from 146 countries and regions.
At a lecture held by the SPC on Friday, Shen Hongyu, director of the Fourth Civil Division of the SPC, told the Global Times that in recent years, Chinese courts have become more influential in participating in and promoting global ocean governance reform. Maritime justice serves as an important instrument for practicing the vision of a maritime community with a shared future and for advancing the reform of the global ocean governance system. 
。    原标题：习近平作出重要指示强调          　　巩固拓展树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育成果          　　努力创造经得起实践人民历史检验的实绩          　　蔡奇主持中央党的建设工作领导小组会议并讲话          　　李希出席并讲话          　　新华社北京8月24日电 中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平近日作出重要指示强调，树立和践行正确政绩观是一项长期任务，必须久久为功，不断巩固拓展学习教育成果，持续推动各级党组织和广大党员、干部立党为公、为民造福、科学决策、真抓实干，努力创造经得起实践、人民、历史检验的实绩。

二 |          　　习近平指出，党的十八大以来，针对一个时期党的建设中的重要问题、紧迫问题，在全党组织开展学习教育活动，已经成为党的建设一项重要制度性安排。这次树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育在党中央坚强领导下，坚持把理论学习贯穿始终，真查实改政绩观偏差问题，着眼务实管用立好制度规矩，以严实作风一抓到底，取得明显成效，达到了预期目的。         　　习近平强调，要经常性开展政绩观教育，重点抓好对地方党政正职、新提拔干部、年轻干部、关键岗位干部的教育培训，强化示范引领和反面警示，引导党员、干部始终以正确政绩观担当作为、履职尽责。要坚持常态化查改问题，对需要长期整改的政绩观偏差突出问题盯紧不放、跟踪问效，深化新官不理旧账整改整治。结合巡视巡察、审计监督、统计监督等精准发现问题，增强针对性和穿透力，扎实推动整改。

三 | 要用好考核指挥棒，完善差异化考核评价体系，树立重实干重实绩的选人用人导向，让敢于负责、勇于担当、善于作为、实绩突出的干部受到重用。

四 | 要加强政绩观行为的管理监督，严格执行民主集中制，对领导干部定期谈话提醒，及时发现并纠正苗头性倾向性问题。         　　中央党的建设工作领导小组24日召开会议，深入学习贯彻习近平总书记重要指示精神，总结树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育，研究部署巩固拓展学习教育成果、建立树立和践行正确政绩观长效机制工作。中共中央政治局常委、中央党的建设工作领导小组组长蔡奇主持会议并讲话，中共中央政治局常委、中央党的建设工作领导小组副组长李希出席会议并讲话。         　　会议强调，习近平总书记的重要指示，对学习教育工作和成效给予充分肯定，对巩固拓展学习教育成果、建立树立和践行正确政绩观长效机制提出明确要求，全党要认真学习领会、全面贯彻落实。         　　会议指出，这次学习教育目前已基本结束。在以习近平同志为核心的党中央坚强领导下，各级党组织扛牢责任，一体推进学查改，推动广大党员、干部深化了对正确政绩观的认识和理解，有效解决了一批政绩观偏差突出问题，实实在在加强了党性锻炼，进一步规范了各级领导干部从政行为，为地方各级领导班子换届打下了良好思想政治基础，有力促进了“十五五”开局起步各项工作。这次学习教育坚持守正创新、简约务实，丰富了思想引领、真查实改、以上率下、标本兼治、服务中心等经验，进一步深化了对党内集中教育的规律性认识。         　　会议强调，这次学习教育不是终点而是新的起点。要坚持不懈强化党的创新理论武装，深入学习贯彻习近平党建思想和习近平总书记重要指示精神，巩固拓展学习教育成果，建立长效机制。

五 | 要持续推进政绩观教育，经常性查改政绩观偏差问题，树立重实干重实绩的用人导向，推动党员、干部不断增强树立和践行正确政绩观的思想自觉和行动自觉。要加强日常管理监督，防止任性用权，抓典型抓现行抓通报，保持强力震慑。要压实政治责任，抓好学习教育“回头看”，强化督促检查，有效传导压力，层层推动落实。         　　石泰峰、李书磊、穆虹出席会议。         　　中央党的建设工作领导小组成员等参加会议。【编辑:刘阳禾】。

Current article:http://www.zhanggengsenchaiweikeng.cfd/n6fbr6/b49j.html

Published on:16:15:41